OPEN SCIENCE AND INDIGENOUS DIGITAL PLATFORMS UNDER THE CARE PRINCIPLES
Keywords:
open access, knowledge management, digital repositories, joint authorship, knowledge organizationAbstract
This study aims to analyze how digital platforms for managing Indigenous knowledge and heritage operationalize the CARE Principles (Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, and Ethics), discussing their contributions to ethical digital infrastructures in the Brazilian context of Open Science. It is characterized as qualitative, exploratory, and comparative research, based on multiple case studies. Mukurtu CMS, Ara Irititja, and Plateau Peoples’ Web Portal were analyzed through public documentation and observation of their functionalities. The results indicate that the initiatives incorporate, to different degrees, CARE mechanisms, such as cultural protocols, differentiated levels of access, collaborative curation, community-based contextualization, digital return of historical materials, and protection of sensitive content. It was observed that the governance of these collections involves collective rights, community participation, and institutional responsibilities. In the Brazilian context, the cases highlight the relevance of mechanisms that recognize cultural protocols, community authorities, provenance, and collective authorship. The study concludes that the articulation between Open Science, FAIR, and CARE can support digital infrastructures sensitive to the specificities of Indigenous peoples, reconciling sharing, protection, and self-determination.
References
ALBAGLI, Sarita. Ciência aberta em questão. In: ALBAGLI, Sarita; MACIEL, Maria Lucia; ABDO, Alexandre Hannud (org.). Ciência aberta, questões abertas. Brasília, DF: IBICT; Rio de Janeiro: UNIRIO, 2015. Disponível em: https://brapci.inf.br/v/199616. Acesso em: 23 maio 2026.
ANDERSON, Jane. Access and control of Indigenous knowledge in libraries and archives: ownership and future use. In: CORRIGAN, Ray; HEATH, Graham; EDWARDS, Elizabeth (org.). Correcting course: rebalancing copyright for libraries in the national and international arena. New York: American Library Association, 2005. p. 1-36. Disponível em: https://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/alaconf2005/paper_anderson.pdf. Acesso em: 25 maio 2026.
ARA IRITITJA. Overview. [S. l.]: Aṟa Irititja, [20--]. Disponível em: https://irititja.com/sharing-knowledge/overview/. Acesso em: 25 maio 2026.
ARA IRITITJA PROJECT. Ara Irititja Project: protocols, policies and best practice guidelines. [S. l.]: Ara Irititja Project, 2016. Disponível em: http://www.irititja.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2016-Protocols-and-Policies-v2-iphone.pdf. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2026.
BANIWA, Gersem. Antropologia indígena: o caminho da descolonização e da autonomia indígena. In: REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE ANTROPOLOGIA, 26., 2008, Porto Seguro. Anais [...]. Porto Seguro: Associação Brasileira de Antropologia, 2008. Disponível em: https://anais.abant.org.br/26rba/mesas_redondas/trabalhos/MR%2018/gersem%20baniwa.pdf. Acesso em: 5 jun. 2026.
BORGMAN, Christine L. The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Hoboken, v. 63, n. 6, p. 1059-1078, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22634. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
CARROLL, Stephanie Russo; GARBA, Ibrahim; FIGUEROA-RODRÍGUEZ, Oscar L.; HOLBROOK, Jarita et al. The CARE principles for Indigenous data governance. Data Science Journal, Paris, v. 19, n. 1, art. 43, p. 1-12, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
CARROLL, Stephanie Russo; ERCZOG, Edit; HUDSON, Māui; RUSSELL, Keith et al. Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR principles for Indigenous data futures. Scientific Data, London, v. 8, art. 108, p. 1-6, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00892-0. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
CARROLL, Stephanie Russo; RODRIGUEZ-LONEBEAR, Desi; MARTINEZ, Andrew. Indigenous data governance: strategies from United States Native Nations. Data Science Journal, Paris, v. 18, n. 1, art. 31, p. 1-15, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-031. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
CHRISTEN, Kimberly. Ara Irititja: protecting the past, accessing the future: Indigenous memories in a digital age. Museum Anthropology, Hoboken, v. 29, n. 1, p. 56-60, 2005. DOI: 10.1525/mua.2005.29.1.56. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1525/mua.2005.29.1.56. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
CHRISTEN, Kimberly. Does information really want to be free? Indigenous knowledge systems and the question of openness. International Journal of Communication, Los Angeles, v. 6, p. 2870-2893, 2012. Disponível em: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1618. Acesso em: 25 maio 2026.
CHRISTEN, Kimberly. Tribal archives, traditional knowledge, and local contexts: why the “s” matters. Journal of Western Archives, Logan, v. 6, n. 1, art. 3, p. 1-19, 2015. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/westernarchives/vol6/iss1/3/. Acesso em: 25 maio 2026.
CHRISTEN, Kimberly; MERRILL, Alex; WYNNE, Michael. A community of relations: Mukurtu hubs and spokes. D-Lib Magazine, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 5/6, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1045/may2017-christen. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Turning FAIR into reality: final report and action plan from the European Commission Expert Group on FAIR Data. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2777/1524. Acesso em: 09 nov. 2026.
FECHER, Benedikt; FRIESIKE, Sascha. Open science: one term, five schools of thought. In: BARTLING, Sönke; FRIESIKE, Sascha (ed.). Opening science: the evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Cham: Springer, 2014. p. 17-47. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
FONSECA, Diego Leonardo de Souza; ZANINELLI, Thais Batista. Modelos conceituais de gestão do conhecimento indígena: uma discussão na ciência da informação. Transinformação, Campinas, v. 36, p. 1-12, 2024. Disponível em: https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/10685. Acesso em: 5 jun. 2026.
GLOBAL INDIGENOUS DATA ALLIANCE. CARE principles for Indigenous data governance. [S. l.]: GIDA, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.gida-global.org/careprinciples. Acesso em: 25 maio 2026.
GONÇALVES, Nanashara Ferreira Piazentin. Expressões culturais tradicionais e acesso aberto: uma postura ética diante de um conflito. Internet & Sociedade, São Paulo, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-27, 2022. Disponível em: https://revista.internetlab.org.br/expressoes-culturais-tradicionais-e-acesso-aberto-uma-postura-etica-diante-de-um-conflito/. Acesso em: 5 jun. 2026.
HENNING, Patricia Corrêa; RIBEIRO, Claudio José Silva; SANTOS, Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva; SANTOS, Paula Xavier dos. GO FAIR e os princípios FAIR: o que representam para a expansão dos dados de pesquisa no âmbito da ciência aberta. Em Questão, Porto Alegre, v. 25, n. 2, p. 389-412, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245252.389-412. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
HUDSON, Maui; CARROLL, Stephanie Russo; ANDERSON, Jane; BLACKWATER, Darrah et al. Indigenous peoples’ rights in data: a contribution toward Indigenous research sovereignty. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, Lausanne, v. 8, art. 1173805, p. 1-10, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1173805. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS. IEEE 2890-2025: IEEE recommended practice for provenance of Indigenous Peoples’ data. New York: IEEE, 2025. Disponível em: https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/2890/10318/. Acesso em: 25 maio 2026.
KUKUTAI, Tahu; TAYLOR, John (ed.). Indigenous data sovereignty: toward an agenda. Canberra: ANU Press, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
LOCAL CONTEXTS. Plateau Peoples’ Web Portal TK Labels. [S. l.]: Local Contexts, 2020. Disponível em: https://localcontexts.org/plateau-peoples-web-portal-tk-labels/. Acesso em: 25 maio 2026.
LOCAL CONTEXTS. TK Labels. [S. l.]: Local Contexts, [20--]. Disponível em: https://localcontexts.org/labels/traditional-knowledge-labels/. Acesso em: 25 maio 2026.
MATHIAS, Fernando. Conhecimentos tradicionais: novos rumos e alternativas de proteção. In: RICARDO, Beto; RICARDO, Fany (ed.). Povos indígenas no Brasil: 2001-2005. São Paulo: Instituto Socioambiental, 2006. Disponível em: https://pib.socioambiental.org/pt/Conhecimentos_tradicionais:_Novos_rumos_e_alternativas_de_prote%C3%A7%C3%A3o. Acesso em: 5 jun. 2026.
MUKURTU CMS. Manage media access with cultural protocols. [S. l.]: Mukurtu CMS, [20--]. Disponível em: https://docs.mukurtu.org/media/ManageMediaAccessWithProtocols/. Acesso em: 21 jun. 2026.
MUKURTU CMS. Understanding communities and cultural protocols. [S. l.]: Mukurtu CMS, [20--]. Disponível em: https://docs.mukurtu.org/communities-cultural-protocols-categories/UnderstandingCommunitiesAndCulturalProtocols/. Acesso em: 21 jun. 2026.
MUKURTU CMS. Understanding community records. [S. l.]: Mukurtu CMS, [20--]. Disponível em: https://docs.mukurtu.org/digital-heritage-items/UnderstandCommunityRecords/. Acesso em: 21 jun. 2026.
MUKURTU CMS. Understanding sharing settings. [S. l.]: Mukurtu CMS, [20--]. Disponível em: https://docs.mukurtu.org/communities-cultural-protocols-categories/UnderstandingSharingSettings/. Acesso em: 21 jun. 2026.
OPENAIRE. How to make your data FAIR. [S. l.]: OpenAIRE, [20--]. Disponível em: https://www.openaire.eu/how-to-make-your-data-fair. Acesso em: 23 maio 2026.
PLATEAU PEOPLES’ WEB PORTAL. Plateau Peoples’ Web Portal. [S. l.]: Plateau Peoples’ Web Portal, [20--]. Disponível em: https://plateauportal.libraries.wsu.edu/. Acesso em: 25 maio 2026.
REIJERKERK, Dana. UX design in online catalogs: practical issues with implementing Traditional Knowledge (TK) labels. First Monday, Chicago, v. 25, n. 8, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i8.10406. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
SANTILLI, Juliana. Socioambientalismo e novos direitos: proteção jurídica à diversidade biológica e cultural. São Paulo: Peirópolis; Instituto Socioambiental; Instituto Internacional de Educação do Brasil, 2005. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/REDESG/article/view/16136. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2026.
SAVIC, Dobrica. From digitization and digitalization to digital transformation. The Grey Journal, Amsterdam, v. 16, n. 1, p. 23-32, 2020. Disponível em: http://greyguide.isti.cnr.it/attachments/category/52/GL21_Savic.pdf. Acesso em: 6 jun. 2026.
SOUZA, Poppy de; DMONDS, Fran; MCQUIRE, Scott; EVANS, Michelle et al. Aboriginal knowledge, digital technologies and cultural collections: policy, protocols, practice. Melbourne: Melbourne Networked Society Institute, 2016. Disponível em: https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/21112416/1000007901_published_report.pdf. Acesso em: 25 maio 2026.
THORPE, Kirsten; CHRISTEN, Kimberly; BOOKER, Lauren; GALASSI, Monica. Designing archival information systems through partnerships with Indigenous communities. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, [s. l.], v. 25, p. 1-18, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v25i0.2917. Acesso em: 12 nov. 2026.
TORINO, Emanuelle; MONTEIRO, Elizabete Cristina de Souza de Aguiar; VIDOTTI, Silvana Aparecida Borsetti Gregorio. Plano de gestão de dados de pesquisa de povos indígenas: considerações acerca dos princípios FAIR e CARE. Revista Brasileira de Preservação Digital, Campinas, v. 4, e023007, p. 1-23, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.20396/rebpred.v4i00.17936. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
UNESCO. Recomendação da UNESCO sobre ciência aberta. Paris: UNESCO, 2022. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949_por. Acesso em: 23 maio 2026.
VERHOEF, Peter C.; BROEKHUIZEN, Thijs; BART, Yakov; BHATTACHARYA, Abhi et al. Digital transformation: a multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, Amsterdam, v. 122, p. 889-901, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
WILKINSON, Mark D.; DUMONTIER, Michel; AALBERSBERG, IJsbrand Jan; APPLETON, Gabrielle et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, London, v. 3, art. 160018, p. 1-9, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18. Acesso em: 09 nov. 2026.